A couple of example letters.
WA Department of Health – PO Box 8172
Perth Business Centre
Perth WA 6849
Monday, 4 July 2016
To whom it may concern,
I herein protest the crime of water fluoridation committed by officials of WA’s department of health. Dumping hazardous toxic industrial waste into public water supplies against the express wishes and informed judgement of the wider community is a felony. The department claims its action is a population-based medical intervention in defiance of the community’s emphatic refusal to accept this or any other medical intervention. This unconditional refusal is not a request but a non-negotiable direction from the communities of Irwin and Moora, potential victims of an unnecessary, unsought, unwanted and demonstrably harmful medical intervention.
This inalienable right of refusal is protected by international law. A core tenet of the United Nations contained in article one its charter is supporting human rights. This includes the unassailable right to informed choice in regard to refusing hazardous medical interventions. The Nuremberg code unmistakably asserts that informed consent is absolutely essential. The international covenant on civil and political rights also enforces strict prohibition against unsought and involuntary medical interventions. The charter states ‘No one shall be subjected, without free and voluntary consent, to medical interventions.’
This is a matter of incontrovertible international law. 193 countries are signatories to UNESCO’s 2005 universal bioethics and human rights charter that further reinforces this indisputable precept. It plainly states that any preventive medical intervention can only take place with the free and fully informed consent of all participants.
WA health department officials incorrectly claim authorization for poisoning water supplies with toxic fluoride is upheld by statute law but statute law is entirely dependent upon the consent of the governed without which it is denied the force of law. In the case of water fluoridation not only is that consent withdrawn it is explicitly refused. In addition, all WA state law must be entirely consistent with international law. Forced medical intervention against the express will of the people patently contravenes this law.
Department officials consistently and unlawfully ignore urgent warnings of peer-reviewed and comprehensively corroborated proof of harm; incontestable evidence condemning the practice of water fluoridation as evidenced by 95% of the rest of the world rejecting this proven harm.
Accordingly charges of misconduct of public office – maleficence of public office – breach of trust and gross duty of care neglect require immediate investigation from your department.
I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours truly,
Tony Lambert.
Corruption and Crime Commission
PO Box 7667
Cloisters Square
St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6850 04/07/2016
Dear Sir or Madam,
I herein write in official report of a crime committed by officials of WA’s department of health. The offense is that of dumping hazardous toxic industrial waste into public water supplies against the express wishes and informed judgement of the wider community. The department claims its action is a population-based medical intervention in outrageous defiance of the community’s emphatic refusal to accept this or any other medical intervention. This unconditional refusal is not a request but a non-negotiable direction from the communities of Irwin and Moora, potential victims of an unnecessary, unsought, unwanted and demonstrably harmful medical intervention.
This inalienable right of refusal is protected by international law. A core tenet of the United Nations contained in article one its charter is supporting human rights. This includes the unassailable right to informed choice in regard to refusing hazardous medical interventions. The Nuremberg code unmistakably asserts that informed consent is absolutely essential. The international covenant on civil and political rights also enforces strict prohibition against unsought and involuntary medical interventions. The charter states ‘No one shall be subjected, without free and voluntary consent, to medical interventions.’
This is a matter of incontrovertible international law. 193 countries are signatories to UNESCO’s 2005 universal bioethics and human rights charter that further reinforces this undisputable precept. It plainly states that any preventive medical intervention can only take place with the free and fully informed consent of all participants.
WA health department officials incorrectly claim authorisation for poisoning water supplies with toxic fluoride is upheld by statute law but statute law is entirely dependent upon the consent of the governed without which it is denied the force of law. In the case of water fluoridation not only is that consent suspended it is explicitly refused. In addition, all WA state law must be entirely consistent with international law. Forced medical intervention against the express will of the people patently contravenes this law.
Department officials consistently and unlawfully ignore urgent warnings of peer-reviewed and comprehensively corroborated proof of harm; incontestable evidence condemning the practice of water fluoridation as evidenced by 95% of the rest of the world rejecting this proven harm.
Accordingly charges of misconduct of public office – maleficence of public office – breach of trust and gross duty of care neglect require immediate investigation from your department.
I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours truly,
Tony Lambert
Many of these people know the depth and extent of their crimes. They are reminded that no ‘so-called’ authority can compel anyone to commit a crime.
The concept of total wellness recognizes that our every thought, word, and behavior affects our greater health and well-being. And we, in turn, are affected not only emotionally but also physically and spiritually.
Greg Anderson