12 January 2018

The proof that vaccines have not been adequately tested for safety and efficacy is provided in my PhD thesis published by the University of Wollongong (UOW). The UOW would be breaching academic integrity if they were allowing my research to provide unsupported arguments that could harm human health.

Yet even as the UOW stands by this research we have seen attempts to suppress my research instead of debating the arguments. Notably, there are no UOW academics, Australian government public health officials or medical doctors who have publicly debated this research and this is endangering public health in Australia.

My PhD thesis is titled “A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ and it provides academic arguments that show the government’s schedule of 16 vaccines is the most likely cause of the illnesses and many deaths that are being observed in todays children. To date the arguments I have provided have not been refuted with hard evidence and this is why the University of Wollongong (UOW) is standing by this research.

Yet the Australian media is permitting individuals to denigrate my university research with false information and this is resulting in a culture of ignorance – in politicians and the public – that is dangerous to public health. This is described as the ‘social production of ignorance through the publication of inaccurate or misleading information’ (Agnotology) and it is described in Chapter 8 of my PhD thesis. Here is the summary of Chapter 8 of my thesis and here is a link to the evidence in Chapter 8 that shows false and misleading claims are underpinning Australia’s coercive and mandatory vaccination policies.

Please also investigate Pixie Seymour’s ‘Agnotology in Vaccines‘ published in 2017. This book will help you understand how the political system in Australia has resulted in health policies that protect industry interests and not public health.

My PhD research shows that Australia’s mandatory and coercive vaccination polices in Social Welfare legislation will harm human health and the political decision-makers of the No Jab No Pay/Play policies will be liable for the harm these policies will cause. This legislation will also discriminate against healthy children for enrolment into childcare and preschool centres, i.e. they are discriminating in early childhood education.

My thesis concludes that the Australian government has not proved that the National Immunisation Program (NIP), that recommends vaccines against 16 diseases, is not causing the significant increase in chronic illness (including autism) that has occurred simultaneously in children as the vaccination program has expanded.

If these facts concern you please write to the UOW Vice-Chancellor, Paul Wellings, to ask why UOW academics and medical professionals will not publicly debate my vaccination research in an open forum. This is contrary to the charter of universities.

In October 2015 a vaccination forum was organised at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) to discuss the public’s concerns about the government’s new mandatory and coercive vaccination legislation that was implemented on 1 January 2016.

The video link below names ~ 45 Australian government representatives and public health officials that declined to attend this forum to present the case for mandating vaccines in social welfare legislation. The forum was titled Questions and Answers: No Jab No Pay/Play Policy.

This presentation explains how this policy is a danger to human health and how it breaches fundamental human rights – including the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention and the Rights of the Child. It also shows how government’s have reversed the precautionary principle to protect industry interests in government policies and not the health of the population. Some people may call this a crime against humanity and civil action will be taken to protect our rights.

Currently there is a federal government review of religious freedoms in Australia but please note that religious freedoms with regard to childhood vaccinations have already been removed. This was done in 2016 with the implementation of No Jab No Pay policies. Along with the removal of conscientious objection and philosophical objections to what is injected into the human body in vaccines. Some of these ingredients are listed below. 

The Australian government has not stated whether the submissions for this review (due by 31 January) will be made public. It has also not clarified if anonymous submissions will be published for open public assessment of the arguments.

Dr. Judy Wilyman
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong.
PhD in The Science and Politics of the Australian Government’s Vaccination Program, UOW School of Social Science, Media and Communication (re-named the School of Humanities and Social Inquiry in 2014).